[CentOS] Yum thing

Johnny Hughes mailing-lists at hughesjr.com
Tue Sep 6 11:10:23 UTC 2005


On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 09:59 +0200, Henk van Lingen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> As there is no (decent) way to specify a particular repo for an
> particular package with yum, I'm having an odd problem: Although 
> the version numbers differ, I have 2 spamassassin pkgs in different
> repo's (updates and my own addons) which are seen as updates to 
> eachother:
> 
> jelsum:/root-# tail -11 /var/log/yum.log
> Sep 02 04:26:34 Installed: perl-Mail-SpamAssassin.i386 3.1.0-1
> Sep 02 04:26:35 Updated: spamassassin.i386 3.1.0-1
> Sep 03 05:01:36 Obsoleting: spamassassin.i386 3.0.4-1.el4
> Sep 03 05:01:37 Erased: perl-Mail-SpamAssassin
> Sep 04 04:37:52 Installed: perl-Mail-SpamAssassin.i386 3.1.0-1
> Sep 04 04:37:53 Updated: spamassassin.i386 3.1.0-1
> Sep 05 04:21:15 Obsoleting: spamassassin.i386 3.0.4-1.el4
> Sep 05 04:21:16 Erased: perl-Mail-SpamAssassin
> Sep 06 04:34:37 Installed: perl-Mail-SpamAssassin.i386 3.1.0-1
> Sep 06 04:34:50 Updated: syslinux.i386 3.11-1.2.el4.rf
> Sep 06 04:34:51 Updated: spamassassin.i386 3.1.0-1
> 
> What can be wrong?

Not sure, but you can use an:

exclude=perl-Mail-SpamAssassin

in the repo that has the old one and see if that helps. (This would go
in the configuration for that repo and not in the global configuration).

If it still happens, there is an issue with the new version of
spamassassin.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050906/9196b984/attachment.bin


More information about the CentOS mailing list