[CentOS] Why is yum not liked by some?
craigwhite at azapple.com
Wed Sep 7 22:11:44 UTC 2005
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 12:53 -0700, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> Craig White <craigwhite at azapple.com> wrote:
> > on server systems I find it to be a good idea. If you set
> > up as one LVM volume, it's not going to be on it's own
> > partition.
> Aw now, don't get anal. ;->
> Besides, that's all subjective.
> E.g., even a "Logical Partition" isn't a partition. It's a
> "partition in a partition" since the legacy PC BIOS/DOS disk
> label can only have 4 partitions.
if you have seen true anal retentive behavior, then you would not willy
nilly call me being anal for the above - but rather your inclination to
put exactness to the statement I made in your own terms is much closer
to anal retentive behavior.
Granted what I stated didn't precisely cover all the various
possibilities of partitioning with or without LVM and therefore lacked
the precision that you hold so dear.
Thankfully, I have a sense of humor but not everyone enjoys having their
posts picked apart for what appears to only be petty corrections to
their imprecision...you should keep that in mind.
More information about the CentOS