[CentOS] Re: Kind of OT: internal imap server
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Thu Aug 31 12:59:39 UTC 2006
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 22:23, Feizhou wrote:
> >> I wish I could find an UNBIASED comparison of the main MTA's.
> >> I just seem to find ones that slant to the one that just happens to be used by
> >> the writer.
> >
> > Not possible? Those who bother to reply have probably had a variety of
> > experience and settled on what they thought was best for their
> > situation. For them to express anything other than recommendations
> > (mostly) for their selection would be .. illogical ... Kirk!
>
> It is possible. The problem is whether others will allow their
> prejudices to cloud whatever is recommended. eg: some would never
> install qmail even if it is the best for that particular situation and
> tell everybody else so too.
That's kind of the point of giving advice on mail lists. If
you've had a bad experience with something you can spare other
people similar pain. And it is pretty much guaranteed that
you'll have a bad experience with a stock qmail system the
first time you get a dictionary-type attack to your domain
or if you send a lot of group messages over low-bandwidth
links.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the CentOS
mailing list