[CentOS] [OT] RedHat's licence, CentOS rebuild
William Hooper
whooperhsd3 at earthlink.netFri Aug 18 20:32:39 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] [OT] RedHat's licence, CentOS rebuild
- Next message: [CentOS] [OT] RedHat's licence, CentOS rebuild
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Philip Wyett wrote: > On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:38 -0400, Alain Reguera wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> >> I've been talking with some friends about the Redhat's SRPMs release >> issue. I've been reading the trademarks and some points of GPL. But get >> some confusion around the questions: >> >> Is redhat forced to release the sources of its product? >> > > RedHat choose to use and release GPL code and a requirement of that is > the making available of the source code. Two things: 1) Point me to the clause in the GPL that says you have to give the source away to someone you didn't give binaries to. 2) There is a bunch of software in RHEL that isn't GPL. -- William Hooper
- Previous message: [CentOS] [OT] RedHat's licence, CentOS rebuild
- Next message: [CentOS] [OT] RedHat's licence, CentOS rebuild
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list