[CentOS] OT: CentOS hosting recommendations

Thu Aug 31 00:11:14 UTC 2006
Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at darkover.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 07:35:07PM -0400, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
> > Check out LiquidWeb, www.liquidweb.com.
> 
> Sorry to intervene in your discussion, but I wouldn't trust a company with
> such a flashy, unprofessional website!

That really isn't true for hosting companies. The worst companies around
have very "professional" websites.

In any case, my previous recomendation stands: go to webhostingtalk.com
and look around. If not satisfied with what you find, ask for reviews.

> You might even *try* (30 days money back, and they do it!) a shared virtual
> one, you might be impressed. Mine is very usually responsive, GNAX.net has a
> good connectivity with America, and they fix any inconvenience *very*
> quickly.

GNax recently moved to Atlanta NAP, which is where another hosting
company Wiresix is also located. Wiresix is the company I have been
using for the last year, and I didn't have a single issue with them.
Quite on the contrary, at least 2 of my servers came with extra
features for no extra charge.

Not to mention the fact that Ryan will do everything possible to
keep customers 100% satisfied.

[]s

- -- 
Rodrigo Barbosa
"Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFE9ikipdyWzQ5b5ckRAo5sAKCBpqSDRsK4Uys0en+03h4yabxyiwCfQHsW
/l39CzOYZC+3w/conzXK0Ls=
=ZxXY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----