[CentOS] Yum upgrade to 4.4 problem

Thu Aug 31 15:54:11 UTC 2006
Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com>

On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 16:43 +0100, Will McDonald wrote:
> On 31/08/06, Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey at buc.com> wrote:
> > Will McDonald wrote:
> >
> > >From your second link:
> >    Yes, I did get lots of duplicate packages but I've already fixed
> >    that.  Basically, what I did was to run Adam Stoke's script to
> >    remove duplcate packages. It can be located at
> >    http://astokes.org/?q=node/49
> >
> > That website is no longer working.  Is there still a copy of this
> > script floating around?
> 
> Not that I could find unfortunaltey. I've just done...
> 
> [root at willspc ~]# for package in `rpm -qa --qf "%{NAME}.%{arch}\n" |
> sort | uniq -d | grep -v kernel`;
> do
>   rpm -q $package;
> done
> 
> Which lists all base duplicated packages (though at least kernel and
> gpg-pubkey are this way by design I believe). Then manually removed
> the older packages. You could THORETICALLY do...
> 
> # for duppackage in `rpm -qa --qf "%{NAME}.%{arch}\n" | sort | uniq -d
> | grep -Ev '(kernel)|(gpg-pubkey)'`;
> do
>   for olderpackage in `rpm -q $duppackage | head -1`
>   do
>     rpm -e $olderpackage;
>   done
> done
> 
> WARNING: ^^^^ That's entirely untested and reliant on the ordering
> from rpm output, which looks consistent but I couldn't *swear* to it.
> So be careful! :)
> 
> Will.
> _______________________________________________

personally, I would remove the new package and re-update in case
something in cleanup is required for proper operations.

what does everyone think.

Not trying to jinx myself, but I have never had this problem using
centos on hundreds of servers.

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060831/06cd7e96/attachment-0005.sig>