[CentOS] "find" statement: 64bit related??

Bowie Bailey Bowie_Bailey at BUC.com
Fri Jan 13 20:24:49 UTC 2006


rado wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 13:02 -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > rado wrote:
> > > hi!
> > > 3 machines all run this same test script. 2 -i386,  1 x-64bit
> > > machine. 
> > > 
> > > this line:
> > > 
> > > if find / -mount -type f -mtime -1 -print0 | xargs -0 clamscan -l
> > > \ $CLAMDAILY $CLAMEXCLUDES -r --no-summary | cut -d: -f1 >
> > > $CHANGEDLOG; \ then 
> > > 
> > > the $CHANGEDLOG file... on the 32 bit boxes...oh, probably 220
> > > files. On the 64bit box 177,999 files lol (Centos 64bit
> > > w/everything installed)! 
> > > 
> > > it seems to me that the system is disregarding "-mtime -1"
> > > 
> > > sure has me puzzled! I have rechecked all of my assigned variables
> > > over and over in the cfg file and the syntax of the functions in
> > > the functions file that make up the whole "team". I can find
> > > nothing remarkable relating to the 64 box's cfg.
> > > 
> > > any suggestions?
> > 
> > It seems to work fine on my 64-bit machines.
> > 
> > Try running this to see what is being selected:
> > find / -mount -type f -mtime -1 -print0 | xargs -0 ls -ld >
> > new_files.txt 
> > 
> > With the 'ls -ld', you will see the modification times as well, so
> > you can tell if it is really selecting the wrong files.
> > 
> yes, it really is selecting the wrong files...getting all kinds of
> dates...

Time for the mantra of computer techs around the world:

    "Hmm...that's odd...it shouldn't do that..."

Don't know what else to tell you.  Anyone else have any ideas?

-- 
Bowie



More information about the CentOS mailing list