[CentOS] Re: SpamAssassin
Scott Silva
ssilva at sgvwater.comMon Jul 24 18:07:21 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] SpamAssassin
- Next message: [CentOS] Statistics on stability?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thomas E Dukes spake the following on 7/24/2006 4:10 AM: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-bounces at centos.org >> [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Feizhou >> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 12:13 AM >> To: CentOS mailing list >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] SpamAssassin >> >> Thomas E Dukes wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I may be a little confused but why is there a spamassassin >> package and >>> a spamassassin perl module? Which is better? It looks >> like the perl >>> module version has more plugins. What if I have both installed? >>> >>> TIA >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CentOS mailing list >>> CentOS at centos.org >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> what spamassassin perl module are you talking about? I only >> see a spamassassin package for Centos 4.3. >> >> spamassassin IS perl. > > Sorry, the perl module is at CPAN. I stumbled across it trying to install a > spamassassin plugin. You are probably getting confused with the rpm of SpamAssassin that you get installed with CentOS, and the newer version that you can get from source. They are the same thing. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
- Previous message: [CentOS] SpamAssassin
- Next message: [CentOS] Statistics on stability?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list