[CentOS] differences between yum update and yum check-update
Kai Schaetzl
maillists at conactive.com
Fri May 5 12:31:18 UTC 2006
Johnny Hughes wrote on Thu, 04 May 2006 17:06:00 -0500:
> It is a replacement and not an upgrade that is causing the issue ... kbs
> (it seems) doesn't have clamav-db.
No. It seems that clamav-db is the whole signature db, providing it as an
upgrade package is somewhat mute I guess.
>
> So it seems that clamav-db gets to be installed, since it is not
> protected. Installing it causes something else to get removed (which
> should be protected) ... but that happens after the initial
> calculations, and it seems protectbase is not working on that set.
>
> I am sure this is a protectbase plugin issue and not a yum issue.
> Though it should be consistent between check-update adn update.
I have submitted for a bugzilla account at the yum duke site, but am still
waiting for the mail. I hope I'll get one soon. Then I submit it.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
More information about the CentOS
mailing list