[CentOS] Protectbase Plugin not working?

[Johnny Hughes]

On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 15:54 +0200, Daniel de Kok wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 23:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> > to 0. It would indeed be nice to have more protection levels (10 can 
> > overwrite 9, 9 can overwrite 8 and so on ...) instead of just yes and no. 
> > That plugin isn't very long, maybe someone plays around with it, I haven't 
> > ever programmed in Python.
> 
> I took that as a challenge and cooked something that does that :). Does
> anyone who uses more repositories than I do want to give it a try? Or
> maybe someone has a nice testcase? (I want to test it a little more
> before putting it online)
> 

Daniel,

Great ... I would like to try it.

If we can get it to work reliably, that is something that we might want
to roll into centos (though we should call it something other than
protectbase).

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060507/33bef00c/attachment.sig>