[CentOS] Which libtiff 3.8.2 do I grab?

Fri May 26 19:44:58 UTC 2006
Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>

Oh, for spandsp see:

http://asterfax.sourceforge.net/SpanDSP.html

and

http://www.soft-switch.org/spandsp-known-issues.html

    * The FAX image handling in libtiff 3.6.1 is broken, so this 
version of libtiff will not function correctly with spandsp (or 
HylaFAX, or any other FAX software, I guess).
    * It seems possible for the libtiff library to fall over when 
handling some bad TIFF files. If spandsp is being used with Asterisk, 
this might bring the entire PBX down. So far only one person has 
reported this. Recent security update patches for libtiff 3.5.7, 
3.6.0, and 3.6.1 hopefully correct this problem.


At 03:27 PM 5/26/2006, Dan Trainor wrote:
>Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>At 02:35 PM 5/26/2006, Dan Trainor wrote:
>>
>>>Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>>Via google:  libtiff 3.8.2
>>>>http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/2839214/com/libtiff-3.8.2-2.x86_64.rpm.html 
>>>>
>>>>This got me to a page all about libtiff 3.8.2 for 'Fedora 
>>>>other'  and a link
>>>>http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3?stat=3&search=libtiff&srodzaj=3
>>>>for other distributions.
>>>>So which do I take?
>>>>? 
>>>>http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/2845370/com/libtiff-3.8.2-2.i386.rpm.html 
>>>>
>>>>please, I really want to get this going!
>>>
>>>
>>>Hi -
>>>
>>>I do not believe that libtiff 3.8.2 is available for CentOS - only 
>>>3.6.1-8 and 3.6.1-10.
>>>
>>>Remember, the goal of the CentOS project is not to provide 
>>>bleeding edge software, so you may well get stuck with a slightly 
>>>older version.
>>
>>So the Asterisk AT Home gang that have built on Centos may have a 
>>real problem with spandsp.
>
>Hi, RObert -
>
>Well, no - not necessarily.  Remember, we try to keep as close to 
>RHEL as we can.  In fact, I don't know of anything that's actually 
>modified to be special for CentOS, aside from the usual.
>
>The *@home guys probably built their own RPMs or installs for their 
>setup.  Even though it's based on CentOS, doesn't mean it has to BE 
>CentOS - it could be a heavily modified version, including 
>additional libraries which are mroe bleeding edge, e.g. libtiff-3.8.2.
>
>Hope that clears some thigns up for you.
>
>Thanks
>-dant
>_______________________________________________
>CentOS mailing list
>CentOS at centos.org
>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060526/447c57f3/attachment-0005.html>