[CentOS] fftw upgrade?

Sat Oct 7 05:20:13 UTC 2006
Ralph Angenendt <ra+centos at br-online.de>

Kjeldgaard Morten wrote:
> Thanks. On rpmforge, fftw ver. 3.* is called fftw3. It is really  
> pretty bad practice to distribute version 3 as a simple upgrade to  
> fftw ver. 2.* when the two versions are not compatible, and the API  
> has changed...

But you're barking up the wrong tree: fftw is not an application which
comes with CentOS, you should take that to the rpmforge users list.

BTW: kbs-CentOS-Extras still has the fftw2 version (and it's still
called fftw there).

Ralph
-- 
Ralph Angenendt......ra at br-online.de | .."Text processing has made it possible
Bayerischer Rundfunk...80300 München | ....to right-justify any idea, even one
Programmbereich.Bayern 3, Jugend und | .which cannot be justified on any other
Multimedia.........Tl:089.5900.16023 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20061007/9106a8e6/attachment-0005.sig>