[CentOS] Re: Using CentOS 3 in and LVS?
jim bartus
jim.bartus at gmail.comFri Sep 15 14:42:03 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Using CentOS 3 in and LVS?
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Using CentOS 3 in and LVS?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[root at tick root]# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-lo:0 DEVICE=lo:0 IPADDR=XX.223.248.104 NETMASK=255.255.255.255 ONBOOT=yes ARP=-arp This is how we did it on our 7.3 machines. All the ones I can find now (yes we still have dozens :( ) are running 2.4.27, but I'm sure we didn't change the setup on this when doing that kernel upgrade. Btw, are you sure you even want to bother with DR? Looking back I wish I had just stuck with LVS-NAT. -jim On 9/15/06, Bart Schaefer <barton.schaefer at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9/14/06, Bart Schaefer <barton.schaefer at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > There's a kernel module "noarp" that's supposed to work for all 2.4.x > > kernels but I can't get its configure to work properly. > > I ended up working around this by directly editing config.status after > running configure. The configure script tries to identify the > directory in which to install the module, and gets confused because > there are multiple kernels (both UP and SMP) installed on the system. > The result of this confusion is a borked sed script (newlines where > they should not be) which trashes the > configure process. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060915/86814ec0/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Using CentOS 3 in and LVS?
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Using CentOS 3 in and LVS?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list