[CentOS] CentOS 4 vs 5 for VMware?

Johnny Hughes johnny at centos.org
Sun Aug 5 23:55:12 UTC 2007


Donald Maner wrote:
> I compiled my own kernels for c4 and c5 that dropped the HZ down to 100.  For me, it's a big improvement, especially when it comes to keeping the clock correct in the vm.  And yes, performance is slightly better, because the vms aren't killing the hardware with unnecessary cpu usage trying to process all those ticks.
> 
> Thanks for the kernels.  Hopefully they will be eventually added to the centosplus repos.
> ________________________________________
> From: centos-bounces at centos.org [centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Ray Van Dolson [rvandolson at esri.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 1:35 PM
> To: centos at centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 vs 5 for VMware?
> 
>> Also, there is a special kernel that helps out on running VMWare that
>> changes the default speed of the system timer, reducing the LA on the
>> host system especially if your guests are mostly idle.  The kernel is
>> available for both 4 and 5.  Please look at
>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2189 for more info.
> 
> Very interesting.  Wasn't aware of that.  Thanks for posting.  Have you
> noticed tangible differences when running stock vs the kernels
> mentioned there?

The kernels are available in testing form here:

http://people.centos.org/~hughesjr/vmware-kernels/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070805/a60eb394/attachment.sig>


More information about the CentOS mailing list