[CentOS] Re: are RPMForge and EPEL compatible?
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Fri Dec 7 00:10:50 UTC 2007
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> I would say that the only thing that needs to top this off is some
> rumours that the other side is going to use bitkeeper for its source
> control, or ESR saying they thought that ZYZ was now his preferred
> repo and RMS saying that the other was the only true repository.
...or why Linux can't include zfs because it can't be restricted enough
to call it free.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the CentOS
mailing list