[CentOS] Re: are RPMForge and EPEL compatible?

Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
Fri Dec 7 00:10:50 UTC 2007


Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> 
> I would say that the only thing that needs to top this off is some
> rumours that the other side is going to use bitkeeper for its source
> control, or ESR saying they thought that ZYZ was now his preferred
> repo and RMS saying that the other was the only true repository.

...or why Linux can't include zfs because it can't be restricted enough 
to call it free.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell at gmail.com



More information about the CentOS mailing list