[CentOS] Expandable network storage
Nicolas Sahlqvist
nicco77 at gmail.comMon Dec 17 11:38:31 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Expandable network storage
- Next message: [CentOS] Expandable network storage
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Thomas, On Dec 17, 2007 10:56 AM, Bleier Thomas <Thomas.Bleier at arcs.ac.at> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm currently thinking about similar configurations, and (also for cost > reasons :-) am also thinking about GNBD with two standard servers as a > "poor man" redundant storage - but I'm wondering if that gives enough > performance for running databases (in my case Oracle) on top of it. The > configuration I'm thinking about would be two current Dell servers with > hardware RAID 10 and connected by a dedicated 1 GBit crossover-cable, > running both the cluster software and Oracle. It depends on the number of queries and how they use the indexes, this will generate the I/O that may or may not be too much for a poor man's solution. > Does anyone use this in "real-World" scenarios and has some practical > experience with it? > I'm afraid I don't have a practical experience. - Nicolas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20071217/a92362c0/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message: [CentOS] Expandable network storage
- Next message: [CentOS] Expandable network storage
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list