[CentOS] Re: dhcpd errors
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
m3freak at rogers.com
Wed Jan 17 15:57:26 UTC 2007
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 10:46 -0500, Jim Perrin wrote:
> > It doesn't make sense. I don't know why the PXE boot would fail after a
> > successful reboot. I still haven't found what this means:
> >
> > dhcpd: DHCPRELEASE of 10.1.1.155 from 00:40:63:e5:77:1a via eth0 (not
> > found)
> >
> > More trouble shooting...
>
> Could you provide us with your dhcpd.conf file (minus any sensitive
> info)? It may be something in the config.
Sure. Here it is (I don't know if that's going to be legible after it's
posted):
ddns-update-style none;
default-lease-time 8640; # 6 days
max-lease-time 8640;
one-lease-per-client true;
option option-128 code 128 = string;
option option-129 code 129 = text;
subnet 10.1.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
range 10.1.1.170 10.1.1.180;
next-server 10.1.1.240;
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
option broadcast-address 10.1.1.255;
option routers 10.1.1.254;
option domain-name "blah.blah";
option domain-name-servers 10.1.1.240;
#option ntp-servers 10.1.1.240;
if substring (option vendor-class-identifier, 0, 9) =
"PXEClient" {
filename "ts-2.1.3/pxelinux.0";
#filename "ts-2.2/pxelinux.0";
}
#else if substring (option vendor-class-identifier, 0, 9) =
"Etherboot" {
# #filename "ts-2.1.3/thinstation.nbi";
# filename "ts-2.2/thinstation.nbi";
# }
host ws001 {
hardware ethernet 00:40:63:E5:71:4F;
fixed-address 10.1.1.150;
}
host ws002 {
hardware ethernet 00:40:63:E5:75:8C;
fixed-address 10.1.1.151;
}
host ws003 {
hardware ethernet 00:40:63:E5:75:8E;
fixed-address 10.1.1.152;
}
host ws004 {
hardware ethernet 00:40:63:E5:76:E7;
fixed-address 10.1.1.154;
}
host ws005 {
hardware ethernet 00:40:63:E5:77:1A;
fixed-address 10.1.1.155;
}
host ws006 {
hardware ethernet 00:40:63:E5:73:FE;
fixed-address 10.1.1.156;
}
host ws007 {
hardware ethernet 00:40:63:E5:74:06;
fixed-address 10.1.1.157;
}
host ws008 {
hardware ethernet 00:40:63:E5:75:39;
fixed-address 10.1.1.158;
}
host ws009 {
hardware ethernet 00:40:63:E5:76:4A;
fixed-address 10.1.1.159;
}
}
After posting this, I wonder if the "one-lease-per-client" parameter is
the cause of the problem.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.18-1.2869.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux
10:48:20 up 4 days, 20:25, 2 users, load average: 0.38, 0.28, 0.17
More information about the CentOS
mailing list