[CentOS] Re: Dovecot .99 Bug - LF not found where expected
webmaster at ew3d.com
Fri Jun 8 15:29:14 UTC 2007
Tony Molloy wrote:
> On Friday 08 June 2007 12:07, Chris Mauritz wrote:
>> Tony Molloy wrote:
>>> On Thursday 07 June 2007 17:59, Chris Mauritz wrote:
>>>> Scott Silva wrote:
>>>>> A RedHat bug report is your only option if you stay with 0.99.
>>>>> I bit the bullet and upgraded to 1.0.0 with an rpm from rpmforge.
>>>>> The performance is much better. Almost as much improvement as when I
>>>>> first switched from wuimap.
>>>> I agree with Scott. I also bit the bullet and went to 1.0 (also from
>>>> rpmforge) and am testing it now. It is noticeably faster and I look
>>>> forward to not dealing with that bug again (though it doesn't happen
>>>> very often).
>>> Could you please give the URL for the download. I'm looking at rpmforge
>>> site and all I can see is 0.99-14
>>> I know it's a friday but...
>> I am pretty sure I used this:
>> Sorry, it wasn't rpmforge after all.
> Happens to the best of us at times. I just thought I was going blind ;-)
Boy, this is starting to sound like it might be a really good package to
add to CentOS plus or extras? (hint hint) And maybe a Wiki on doing the
swap? I'll try to make some notes when I have time to get around to
upgrading dovecot on one of our servers, although I'm no wizard like so
many working to provide CentOS.
I found that my bug report was a duplicate... I searched but nothing
showed up.. but there was a report in April to RedHat. Still, from what
I hear about the config, I would be surprised if they did anything more
than a backport, since it sounds like dovecot 1+ has a lot of nice
More information about the CentOS