[CentOS] is CentOS stable enough ?
Steve Searle
steve at stevesearle.com
Tue Jun 12 08:30:28 UTC 2007
Around 09:21am on Tuesday, June 12, 2007 (UK time), Feizhou scrawled:
> Well, desktop related problems aside, Fedora can be very useful in a
> server environment. Weird that others find Fedora great on the desktop
> but would never touch it with a ten foot pole for a server :P.
Although I find Fedora stable enough to use as a server, the frequency
of having to upgrade to a new version means I find Centos a better
choice. As others have said, upgrading every 4 years or so is much
better than upgrading every year.
I use Fedora on all my workstations, however.
Steve
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting a bad thing?
09:27:34 up 14:06, 0 users, load average: 0.02, 0.01, 0.00
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070612/9f6b9546/attachment.sig>
More information about the CentOS
mailing list