[CentOS] Re: Swap Considerations
ssilva at sgvwater.com
Thu Mar 1 17:29:06 UTC 2007
Mike McCarty spake the following on 3/1/2007 8:43 AM:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>> Might be a little slower with file system overhead, but it is not a
>> problem to
>> do so.
> I have heard that, with ext3, the extra time to use a file
> has mostly been removed.
>> Is there some reason you want to use a file? IMHO a 2 gig swap
>> partition takes
>> the same space as a 2 gig swap file.
> Yes, I'd like to experiment with various amounts of swap,
> and see what best fits my system. I don't want to repartition
> over and over, and reinstall repeatedly. ISTM that if I can
> fix the size of swap by using a file it would be more easily
> But I hope the tuning isn't markedly different for using
> a swap partition and a swap file. Near a min or max, any
> smoothly changing function has a derivative near zero,
> so if the sweet point isn't very far away, it shouldn't
> make much difference to actual performance.
The best swap is un-needed swap. If you need to play with swap for performance
reasons, just get some more memory.
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
More information about the CentOS