[CentOS] CentOS 5.0: Xen vs OpenVZ
Daniel de Kok
danieldk at pobox.comThu May 10 09:48:17 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] CentOS 5.0: Xen vs OpenVZ
- Next message: [CentOS] CentOS 5.0: Xen vs OpenVZ
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 11:23 +0200, Lorenzo wrote: > Also is very easy to migrate one virtual machine to a server to another > for maintenance/reboots. (Live) migration is also possible with Xen. > What I don't like of Xen is the slow restart and the disk management > (either dedicated partition or image file) which can lead to slower > backup and harder migration; instead I'm attracted by the standard and > fully supported kernel. > > Does anyone have experience on Xen and have advice on which could be the > best compromise between the two solutions? Of course with Xen I have to > start all over on learning but... hey I'm a Linux fan, I like to learn! An additional advantage of Xen is that it works with SELinux without much hassle. -- Daniel
- Previous message: [CentOS] CentOS 5.0: Xen vs OpenVZ
- Next message: [CentOS] CentOS 5.0: Xen vs OpenVZ
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list