[CentOS] Filesystem for Maildir
christopher at ias.com.hk
Wed Nov 28 15:18:29 UTC 2007
>> What does fsbench say? It has the best writing performance too?!?
> No, according to the fsbench results, ReiserFS wins on Read Performance,
> but XFS is, approximately, four times more faster on write.
> I said that the ReiserFS have the best performance based on my
> read/write server statics, where read requests are 70% of total I/O
Ah. Too bad reiserfs is not stable enough for you.
> In production, with ReiserFS, the server load average was around 30%
> lower than XFS.
I guess Hans got something right with his reiserfs.
>> Please post your findings. :-)
> I'm doing new tests with ReiserFS, XFS, EXT3 and JFS in CentOS 5. I will
> post soon as possible.
Thank you very much in advance.
> And sorry for my english...
No need to be and it is not bad at all.
More information about the CentOS