[CentOS] [Fwd: Re: rpm spec files for ruby]

[James B. Byrne]

On Tue, September 11, 2007 12:58, James B. Byrne wrote:

>
> Is my understanding of this correct or in what matter is it defective?
>

Evidently defective. I have found another reference that describes
sub-packages.

So the unqualified %files directive is for the base package and the
qualified ones are for the sub-packages.  Is this correct?

Sincerely,

-- 
***          E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel          ***
James B. Byrne                mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited          http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive              vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario             fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3