[CentOS] Re: [tools] Why FC Packages in Centos Repository?
Dag Wieers
dag at centos.orgMon Sep 24 15:54:46 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: [tools] Why FC Packages in Centos Repository?
- Next message: [CentOS] CentOS Plus PHP5 upgrade.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Frank Cox wrote: > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:34:19 +0200 (CEST) > Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com> wrote: > > > In all cases you > > are better off with el5-tagged packages than fc6-tagged packages. > > I can certainly understand and appreciate that. However, some Fedora packages > that I assumed would be "basic" don't seem to exist for Centos. At least, I > haven't found them. > > One example is the Gnumeric spreadsheet. I installed the FC6 gnumeric rpm the > other day and it seems to work on Centos 5. Yes, this is something we should provide within RPMforge and (maybe) even offer by default on a CentOS addon repository. We are working on improving the additional packages from the community, hopefully the future will be much brighter :) -- -- dag wieers, dag at centos.org, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: [tools] Why FC Packages in Centos Repository?
- Next message: [CentOS] CentOS Plus PHP5 upgrade.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list