[CentOS] Upstream vendor's diskless vs LTSP

Hello all,
I have a customer that insists of using upstream vendor's diskless 
(system-config-netboot) rather than LTSP. The reason is that he wants to use 
a 100% packages from the vendor, not from LTSP or any other party.

I try the vendor's diskless system, and although it's very simple to setup, it 
lacks the support and/or documentation whereas LTSP is very good in it.
Another sample is that he wants to connect a scanner to the client, I doubt it 
can be, since there's no documentation about it at all from the vendor.

Is there any fundamental difference between the two setups?
Thank you.
-- 
Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | Linux tutorial 
http://linux2.arinet.org
15:38:01 up 8:32, 2.6.22-14-generic GNU/Linux 
Let's use OpenOffice. http://www.openoffice.org
The real challenge of teaching is getting your students motivated to learn.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080418/481a0e38/attachment.sig>