[CentOS] Re: question regarding mx servers with same priority

Scott Silva ssilva at sgvwater.com
Wed Jul 16 15:10:18 UTC 2008


on 7-16-2008 12:42 AM fabian dacunha spake the following:
> Thanks guys for the immediate reply..
> 
> anyway based on your nice sugeestions i feel that having a mail server
> with different MX records would be definately better than having 2 servers
> with the same MX since i was confused about which setup to be used
> 
> setting up 2 server with same MX
> or one with higher n one with lower priority
> 
> thnks once again
> 
> 
Just remember to have adequate spam and virus scanning on the backup MX also. 
Because it will be hammered with most of the junk eventually.

-- 
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 258 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080716/d7f32e2c/signature.bin


More information about the CentOS mailing list