[CentOS] Re: is CentOS an LSB certified product?
nicholas at oscc.org.my
Fri Jun 27 06:40:17 UTC 2008
Thats a lot of money. The Pass thru mentioned, does it also mean that
payment need to be made?
I wonder what is the purpose of them charging so much?
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 6-18-2008 6:55 AM Johnny Hughes spake the following:
>> Nicholas wrote:
>>> I meant RH, in terms of the RHEL distro. I look forward to have
>>> centos gain the LSB, what is needed for the pass thru? is the main
>>> CentOS community interested?
>>> As for the rest, thank you for the sharing of info.
>>> The LSB should be concern to encourage developers to built stuff
>>> that can be used across distros. LSB should reduce problems of
>>> desktop users who have been finding difficulty in getting stuff like
>>> printer drivers and other paraphernalia. The more distros adopting
>>> LSB then more developers/manufacturers will be encouraged on the use
>>> of LSB.
>> Well .. I have run the latest testing scripts and CentOS-5.1 passes
>> the 3.1 LSB for Core and Desktop.
>> It does not pass the 3.2 LSB tests yet (neither does RHEL-5).
>> I will work with Russ to see if I can get CentOS certified without
>> paying $20,000.00 a year to make it happen.
>> If we have to pay for this, well we can't be certified.
>> Note, only one version of Ubuntu (6.0.6 LTS) and no Debian or Fedora
>> versions are certified.
>> Johnny Hughes
> I really believe that any "standards" organization that charges that
> much is just extorting money for a small perceived benefit.
> If it passes the testing scripts, that should be enough for a "free"
> distribution. Microsoft does the same thing for its "certified"
> drivers. They charge an extortion fee for the service.
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
Nicholas A. Suppiah
Training & Certification Manager
Open Source Competency Centre (OSCC) MAMPU
Tel: 603 8319 1200
Join OSCC MAMPU Mailing Lists
More information about the CentOS