[CentOS] Upgrade perl; package conflict
johnny at centos.org
Sun Jun 29 15:45:27 UTC 2008
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 09:24 +0200, centos at bartbaars.nl wrote:
>> Removing perl.i386 fixed this...
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Ralph Angenendt" <ra+centos at br-online.de>
>> To: centos at centos.org
>> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 8:34:11 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Upgrade perl; package conflict
>> Phil Schaffner wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 08:55 +0200, centos at bartbaars.nl wrote:
>>>> I'm working on upgrading my Xen Domain0 to CentOs 5.2. However, yum
>>>> update gives me a package conflict on perl:
>>>> Using a x86_64 install btw.
>>>> Anyone seen this one??
>>> Please don't hijack threads with a "Reply" when starting a new topic.
>>> This problem is due to the lack of an i386 RPM in x86_64 repos. See
>> perl.i386 is *now* in the extras repository (as stated by the Release
>> Notes) which is enabled by default. As it is not in upstream's x86_64
>> tree, it's not going into the CentOS os/ or updates/ tree either.
>> That's why I closed that bug again.
> I am still having this same problem. The only non-CentOS package I have
> installed is Astro::Time via cpan. I have looked at the bug report but
> am not sure what to do next. I have two x86_64 units that still have
> the problem.
> Any ideas?
Do you not have extras enabled on this machine?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080629/8cbe4daa/signature.bin
More information about the CentOS