[CentOS] Upgrade perl; package conflict
Johnny Hughes
johnny at centos.org
Sun Jun 29 20:41:07 UTC 2008
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>>> Thanks again for your help!!!
>> is it possible that you have extras set at a different priority than
>> base ... you also have the protectbase installed along with priorities
>> (not recommended).
>>
>> You should have these settings for [extras], [base] and [updates]
>> sections in CentOS-Base.repo:
>>
>> priority=1
>> protect=1
>>
>> You should also (after properly configuring your repo files), use
>> yum-priorities and remove yum-protectbase.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>
> Johnny,
>
> That fixed the problem. I had the Extras as set to a priority of 2. I
> also disabled protectbase. Can you comment about the use "protectbase"
> When should it be used?
>
> Thank you much for your help!!!
Protectbase is basically priorities with only 2 options ... 1 and 0
Priorities is the same thing with 1 to 99 as options
So, if you need more control than protected and unprotected, then you
want to use priorities.
Here is more info on each:
http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities
http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/ProtectBase
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080629/2603f982/attachment.sig>
More information about the CentOS
mailing list