[CentOS] RHEL on The Pirate Bay, Mininova, etc
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Sat Mar 22 23:54:24 UTC 2008
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> And in this case, the precedents of hundreds years of contractual law
> would have to be overturned. The GPL license covers source code
> access. The RHEL license covers binary access without restricting your
> rights towards source code.
I don't recall any distinction between what you can do with binaries and
source mentioned in the GPL beyond the requirement that sources must be
made available too. And section 6 (of GPLv2) states explictly that "You
may not impose any further restrictions...". Of course not all of RHEL
is covered by the GPL.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the CentOS
mailing list