[CentOS] Re: "yum update" did not update kernel on one box

Lanny Marcus lannyma at gmail.com
Thu May 8 17:51:30 UTC 2008


On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 10:30 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 5-8-2008 7:39 AM lannyma at gmail.com spake the 
<snip>
> > [root at compaq1300 ~]# fdisk -l
> > 
> > Disk /dev/hda: 81.9 GB, 81964302336 bytes
> > 240 heads, 63 sectors/track, 10587 cylinders
> > Units = cylinders of 15120 * 512 = 7741440 bytes
> > 
> >    Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
> > /dev/hda1   *           1         783     5919448+   7  HPFS/NTFS
> > /dev/hda2             784        5347    34503840    f  W95 Ext'd (LBA)
> > /dev/hda3            5348       10586    39606840   8e  Linux LVM
> > /dev/hda5             784        1566     5919448+   7  HPFS/NTFS
> > /dev/hda6            1567        2920    10236208+   7  HPFS/NTFS
> > /dev/hda7            2921        3733     6146248+   7  HPFS/NTFS
> > /dev/hda8            3734        3747      105808+  83  Linux
> > /dev/hda9            3748        5347    12095968+  8e  Linux LVM
> > [root at compaq1300 ~]#
<snip>
> Looking at the above partition table, it does look like you installed Windows 
> first, which is usually much easier since Windows throws fits if it is not the 
> first partition. Linux is on the last 2 partitions, with what looks like a 
> boot partition and the rest on LVM.

Scott: I am positive that I installed MS Windows XP first, after wiping
the HD. As previously explained, my first installation of WinXP did
*NOT* go well and there are 4 iterations on the HD.....  I have never
installed Windows after Linux.

Yes, it has a very small /boot for CentOS and then the LVM. Take care,
Lanny




More information about the CentOS mailing list