[CentOS] Re: "yum update" did not update kernel on one box
Lanny Marcus
lannyma at gmail.com
Thu May 8 17:51:30 UTC 2008
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 10:30 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 5-8-2008 7:39 AM lannyma at gmail.com spake the
<snip>
> > [root at compaq1300 ~]# fdisk -l
> >
> > Disk /dev/hda: 81.9 GB, 81964302336 bytes
> > 240 heads, 63 sectors/track, 10587 cylinders
> > Units = cylinders of 15120 * 512 = 7741440 bytes
> >
> > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> > /dev/hda1 * 1 783 5919448+ 7 HPFS/NTFS
> > /dev/hda2 784 5347 34503840 f W95 Ext'd (LBA)
> > /dev/hda3 5348 10586 39606840 8e Linux LVM
> > /dev/hda5 784 1566 5919448+ 7 HPFS/NTFS
> > /dev/hda6 1567 2920 10236208+ 7 HPFS/NTFS
> > /dev/hda7 2921 3733 6146248+ 7 HPFS/NTFS
> > /dev/hda8 3734 3747 105808+ 83 Linux
> > /dev/hda9 3748 5347 12095968+ 8e Linux LVM
> > [root at compaq1300 ~]#
<snip>
> Looking at the above partition table, it does look like you installed Windows
> first, which is usually much easier since Windows throws fits if it is not the
> first partition. Linux is on the last 2 partitions, with what looks like a
> boot partition and the rest on LVM.
Scott: I am positive that I installed MS Windows XP first, after wiping
the HD. As previously explained, my first installation of WinXP did
*NOT* go well and there are 4 iterations on the HD..... I have never
installed Windows after Linux.
Yes, it has a very small /boot for CentOS and then the LVM. Take care,
Lanny
More information about the CentOS
mailing list