[CentOS] Picasa vs. native photo management apps
rainer at ultra-secure.de
Sun Nov 2 23:28:10 UTC 2008
Am 02.11.2008 um 20:57 schrieb Lanny Marcus:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Michael Semcheski
> <mhsemcheski at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Glenn <centos at 1bigadmin.biz> wrote:
>>> At 02:57 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote:
>>> I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks
>>> listed above, its very good and fairly easy. It also supports bulk
>>> processing, tagging images, etc.
>>> Its part image database and part image manipulator.
>>> Link? Please? Digicam gives too many hits on search engine even with
>>> refining the search.
>>> (Lurking and inquisitive)
>> Sorry, I did mean Digikam. As you might imply from the k
>> for the c, its a KDE application (although it works fine in a gnome
> Michael: Thank you. I will look into Digikam. At first, I thought
> (assumed) the camcorder we were going to get was MiniDV, but, it uses
> mini DVDs.
I have a co-worker who also has such a camcorder.
He hates it;-)
Because to edit these films, you've basically got to re-rip these
More information about the CentOS