[CentOS] Picasa vs. native photo management apps
Lanny Marcus
lmmailinglists at gmail.comSun Nov 2 19:57:17 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] Picasa vs. native photo management apps
- Next message: [CentOS] Picasa vs. native photo management apps
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Michael Semcheski <mhsemcheski at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Glenn <centos at 1bigadmin.biz> wrote: >> At 02:57 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote: >> >> I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks >> listed above, its very good and fairly easy. It also supports bulk >> processing, tagging images, etc. >> >> Its part image database and part image manipulator. >> >> Link? Please? Digicam gives too many hits on search engine even with >> refining the search. >> (Lurking and inquisitive) > > Sorry, I did mean Digikam. As you might imply from the k substituting > for the c, its a KDE application (although it works fine in a gnome > environment.) > > www.digikam.org Michael: Thank you. I will look into Digikam. At first, I thought (assumed) the camcorder we were going to get was MiniDV, but, it uses mini DVDs. So, I just removed kino and Cinelerra looks like it has a learning curve and no online help. I will look into Digikam. Lanny
- Previous message: [CentOS] Picasa vs. native photo management apps
- Next message: [CentOS] Picasa vs. native photo management apps
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list