[CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?

bruce bedouglas at earthlink.net
Wed Oct 15 14:54:39 UTC 2008


thank you!!!!

just who decides what is the correct list of stuff to talk about on this
list...

and then maybe the rest of us should have a centos+ list, for the other 8
billion things that we might run into that we're trying to solve/share
information for..

jeeze!

oh, my bad, this is probably off topic as well!!

this sounds like catch-22!! (yeah, i'm old!, and well read!)

-----Original Message-----
From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org]On
Behalf Of David Mackintosh
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 7:07 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?


On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:13:18PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:

> And Just to remind everyone that no, this is still not a general
> conversation about stuff list.

How off-topic is it to ask precisely what is on-topic for this list
if questions and discussions of the included components belong on the
support mechanisms for those individual parts, and the rest (ie anaconda
and friends) probably belongs in the upstream vendor's forums?

What does that leave?  The color of the logo?

(I like the blue.)

--
 /\oo/\
/ /()\ \ David Mackintosh |
         dave at xdroop.com  | http://www.xdroop.com



More information about the CentOS mailing list