[CentOS] Probably a bad set-up but which one?
mhullrich at gmail.com
Tue Sep 30 16:35:30 UTC 2008
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 7:32 PM, fred smith
<fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote:
> two things:
> 1. there's already a program named test, which displays no output,
> it merely has an exit status.
And, in general, it is a poor idea showing little imagination to name
a test program "test."
> 2. for a program in your current directory, run it with a preceding "./",
> e.g., "./test"--because "." is not in the path (and shouldn't be).
I rather like having . in my path, and up front. However, programs
should reflect something of their content. The Hello World program
could much more recognizably (and future-referentially) named "hello."
It's one of those mornings....
More information about the CentOS