[CentOS] rpmnew puzzles
cannewilson at googlemail.com
Thu Apr 9 15:30:55 UTC 2009
On Thursday 09 April 2009 15:01:37 George Negoita wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Anne Wilson <cannewilson at googlemail.com>
> > I'm puzzled by such statements as
> > diff /var/clamav/daily.cvd /var/clamav/daily.cvd.rpmnew
> > Binary files /var/clamav/daily.cvd and /var/clamav/daily.cvd.rpmnew
> > differ
> > I thought the point of rpmnew files was so that we could check what has
> > been changed?
> You can check to see what has been changed, since you have both
> versions, but you should use a tool that can compare binary files (if
> that makes any sense to you).
> In your case, you can safely delete daily.cvd.rpmnew, because, most
> probable, freshclam already updated daily.cvd to a newer version.
Thanks, both of you. I did wonder if it was a generated file, but couldn't
see the need for the rpmnew if it was. I'll need to carefully go through the
/etc/clamd.conf.rpmnew, though. A quick look tells me I've lost the mailto,
so I need to check what else has changed.
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090409/e304ed5b/attachment.bin
More information about the CentOS