[CentOS] One for the Cisco experts...
David.Mackintosh at xdroop.com
David.Mackintosh at xdroop.com
Tue Apr 21 18:41:29 UTC 2009
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 01:22:07PM -0500, Sean Carolan wrote:
> SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.17.4.3.1.2.0.176.208.225.191.82 = INTEGER: 389
>
> Does this mean that the machine is plugged into port 389? I didn't
> think there were 389 ports on the switch.
<dry>It'd be a very large switch.</dry>
No, it just means it's reachable through interface number 389. There
is a table somewhere which associates interfance names with
descriptions or even better, the labels which you have hopefully
applied to each interface. (Brief pause while I dig around in my
wiki and various script directories.) If you are digging around in
your cisco, I'd try starting with something like .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.2
which on mine returns information like:
nmpwalk -c public -On -v 1 172.30.0.254 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2 | grep Giga | head
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.2.10101 = STRING: GigabitEthernet1/0/1
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.2.10102 = STRING: GigabitEthernet1/0/2
[...]
In your case I'd look at .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.2.389 to see what the
interface was.
Also possibly useful:
- http://wiki.xdroop.com/space/snmp/Switch+Port+Vlans
- http://wiki.xdroop.com/space/snmp/Switch+Port+Labels
--
/\oo/\
/ /()\ \ David Mackintosh |
dave at xdroop.com | http://www.xdroop.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090421/a86e5b57/attachment.sig>
More information about the CentOS
mailing list