[CentOS] Firewall and nfs mounts
Anne Wilson
cannewilson at googlemail.com
Mon Aug 24 13:30:07 UTC 2009
On Monday 24 August 2009 14:05:20 Barry Brimer wrote:
> > Which ports need to be open on a nfs mount server? And does the client
> > need anything opening?
>
> <http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/docs/DOC-3259>
>
Thanks for the link. I used system-config-securitylevel to activate the
firewall. Since I had selected NFS4 I had expected the shares to be visible.
When they weren't I tried opening 2049 to tcp and udp, but they were not
saved, so I'm inclined to think that the gui NFS4 option had already done
that.
etc/sysconfig/nfs does exist, with everything commented out. The first
section asks me to decide whether mountd is to use NFS_V1,2,or 3. In view of
NFS4 being in s-c-securitylevel, this is confusing.
The ports mentioned in the file are much lower than the ones in the link you
provided, by which I assume that they are intended to obscure the purpose. Is
it wise to start by accepting the ports in the file until everything works,
then try mapping in higher ports?
Anne
--
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090824/b5b39c84/attachment.sig>
More information about the CentOS
mailing list