[CentOS] Firewall for virtual machines
mhullrich at gmail.com
Sat Dec 12 20:09:17 UTC 2009
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl <maillists at conactive.com> wrote:
> Mhr wrote on Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:50:27 -0800:
> Yes, using ZA is a bad idea. XP has its own firewall which is enabled by
> default if you are patched up-to-date. Keep that on.
Now you've sparked my curiosity - how is the XP firewall any better than ZA?
Also, in regard to other answers I've seen on the list, since I'm
using NAT, isn't another firewall just a waste?
More information about the CentOS