[CentOS] tinydns/djbdns opinion poll
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comThu Feb 12 21:04:15 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] tinydns/djbdns opinion poll
- Next message: [CentOS] SquirrelMail Prefs Deleted
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kai Schaetzl wrote: > James B. Byrne wrote on Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:31:39 -0500 (EST): > >> I cannot answer whether this situation is still the case, and I know >> that it was not always the case, but on the last but one update to >> bind my configuration files were all renamed to .rpmsave and there >> were no .rpmnew files created, only the default config files left in >> place of the old ones. > > Hm, when I installed bind last year for providing caching and some > internal name resolution in the LAN, it didn't install many config files. > I had to make up the main files by my own. What I did to get this setup > was to install bind, bind-chroot and caching-nameserver (and remove it > later as I saw I didn't need it). After that I saw at least two updates, > but no changes to config files. You should only install the caching-nameserver package if you have no local DNS config. The point of using it is that it supplies configs for caching-only operation. Any bind install will do caching, but the others expect you to do your own configuration with local zones. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] tinydns/djbdns opinion poll
- Next message: [CentOS] SquirrelMail Prefs Deleted
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list