[CentOS] Repo order - priority plugins
Lanny Marcus
lmmailinglists at gmail.comFri Feb 27 19:37:14 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] Repo order - priority plugins
- Next message: [CentOS] mailscanner installation - centos 5.2 - rpmforge + vanderkooij rpms
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2/27/09, Linux Advocate <linuxhousedn at yahoo.com> wrote: > Guys, what is the best way of arranging the repos with regards to their > priority? Any ideas, especially for all non base ones? > > /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo - priority = 1, 2 > > /etc/yum.repos.d/atrpms.repo > > /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo > There have been some threads on this list, in the past, about EPEL. If I were going to use it, probably it would have the lowest priority, to protect my box. This comment may start a flame war, but I suggest you read the archives, to understand the possible issues that may be involved, if you use EPEL. > /etc/yum.repos.d/kbs-extras.repo > /etc/yum.repos.d/kbs-misc.repo > > /etc/yum.repos.d/rpmforge.repo > > How would we position dags repo?
- Previous message: [CentOS] Repo order - priority plugins
- Next message: [CentOS] mailscanner installation - centos 5.2 - rpmforge + vanderkooij rpms
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list