[CentOS] 3Ware 9650SE tuning advice
rkampen at kampensonline.com
Thu Jan 15 23:04:59 UTC 2009
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> Hello fellow sysadmins!
> I've assembled a whitebox system with a SuperMicro motherboard, case,
> 8GB of memory and a single quad core Xeon processor.
> I have two 9650SE-8LPML cards (8 ports each) in each server with 12 1TB
> SATA drives total. Three drives per "lane" on each card.
> CentOS 5.2 x86_64.
> I'm looking for advice on tuning this thing for performance.
> Especially for the role of performing as either an NFS datastore for
> VMware or an iSCSI one.
> I set up two volumes (one for each card); one RAID6 and one RAID5. I
> used the default 64K block size and am trying various filesystems in
> tandem with it. I stumbled across the following recommendations on
> 3Ware's site:
> echo "64" > /sys/block/sda/queue/max_sectors_kb
> blockdev --setra 16384 /dev/sda
> echo "512" > /sys/block/sda/queue/nr_requests
> But am wondering if there are other things I should be looking at,
> including changing the IO scheduler. Any particular options I should
> use with filesystem creation to match up with my RAID block size?
> I also noted that there is a newer 3Ware driver (2.26.08.004) available
> than the one that comes stock with CentOS 5.2 (2.26.02.008). Not sure
> if I can expect performance improvement by "upgrading", and I imagine
> I'd have to mess with my initrd file in any case or boot with a driver
> disk option and blacklist the built-in driver...
> Thanks for any feedback!
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
Ray, I've had good performance from xfs with large filesystems.
What kind of files are you looking to use, lots of smaller files or
large media files??
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 121 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090115/9bf39fab/attachment.vcf
More information about the CentOS