cannewilson at googlemail.com
Wed Jan 28 16:45:18 UTC 2009
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 13:56:10 cent osserver wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Ned Slider <ned at unixmail.co.uk> wrote:
> > Was that REALLY called for? Couldn't you have simply filed it in
> > /dev/null?
> Yes, I should have. I gave into impulse in a weak moment and then
> REALLY screwed up by not noticing I was replying to the list and not
> the individual. (Most lists have reply-to set to the individual, not
> the list)
So it would have been all right if you had insulted him directly, would it?
The only good thing is he probably never saw it, as some of us help people
off-list with things like this.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090128/fc88d850/attachment.bin
More information about the CentOS