[CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY [OT]

Rob Kampen rkampen at kampensonline.com
Thu Jan 29 21:44:46 UTC 2009



Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: centos-bounces at centos.org 
>> [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Craig White
>> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 15:52
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY
>>
>> On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 13:41 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>>     
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: centos-bounces at centos.org
>>>> [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Brett Serkez
>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 11:55
>>>> To: CentOS mailing list
>>>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Quickbooks and Samba and Oplocks... OH MY
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Tim Nelson 
>>>>         
>> <tnelson at rockbochs.com> 
>>     
>>>> wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> It is widely known that Quickbooks has a horrible storage
>>>>>           
>>>> engine, "requires" Windows to host multiuser access, etc. 
>>>> However, I've successfully been storing QuickBooks files on Samba 
>>>> shares at a handful of locations with no real issues other than 
>>>> slight performance degradation. However, a somewhat recent thread 
>>>> here mentioned the proper use of oplock'ing in the Samba 
>>>> configuration to considerably increase performance/reliability.
>>>>
>>>> I am able to host all files other than Quickbooks on Samba shares.
>>>> The issue with QuickBooks is they run their own WIndows 
>>>>         
>> service on 
>>     
>>>> port 10172 in addition to Windows file sharing.
>>>>         
>>> We run QB Pro 2003, and it does not listen on any ports. We 
>>>       
>> also have 
>>     
>>> it on a samba share. Unsure about the perfomance, but it 
>>>       
>> works for us.
>> ----
>> They've made a bunch (and I mean a bunch) of changes since 
>> then. It's multi-user scheme seems to change with each new version.
>>     
>
> Yeah, we are looking to migrate away for just this reason. It changes away from
> what you need every upgrade.
>
> Anyone else in a consulting/law firm/software dev shop who is a governemnt
> contractor that needs to do cost accounting and wants it to be hosted on a linux
> server? Let me know, we are going to have to do some thing else soon.
>
> BTW, we just found out the Turbo Tax 2008 does not work with older version of
> Quickbooks today.
>
>   
Beware - they tell you QB2007 needs XP and will not work under W2K - 
this is rubbish, they just act as another marketing arm for Redmond.
Also this year with Turbo Tax 2008 they warn it will be the last year it 
will work on W2K, let's wait and see.....
Rob
>> Craig
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS at centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>>     
>
> -Jason 
>
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> -                                                               -
> - Jason Pyeron                      PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
> - Principal Consultant              10 West 24th Street #100    -
> - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333            Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
> -                                                               -
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>   
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: rkampen.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 121 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090129/687fbe5e/attachment.vcf 


More information about the CentOS mailing list