[CentOS] release/update question

[Ralph Angenendt]

Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:17:35 +0200:
> 
> > One of the reasons CentOS chose not to do it
> 
> It appears that only a very very small number of people need it or *think* 
> they need it. 

Probably the latter. CentOS 5 SP 3 would maybe have been a better choice
than CentOS 5.3, as it seems to be not really clear to people that this
is not a "new version", but an update to the 5 series.

Cheers,

Ralph
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090603/51d9b07d/attachment.sig>