[CentOS] release/update question
Karanbir Singh
mail-lists at karan.org
Wed Jun 3 12:37:55 UTC 2009
On 06/03/2009 01:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>> Probably the latter. CentOS 5 SP 3 would maybe have been a better choice
>> than CentOS 5.3
>
> Not if one wants to stay in sync with the RHEL naming scheme :-)
I dont think that will be a problem, since we have never been in sync
with Red Hat's naming scheme.
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq
More information about the CentOS
mailing list