[CentOS] LifeKeeper vs RH/CentOS Cluster
Kwan Lowe
kwan.lowe at gmail.comSun Mar 29 15:14:54 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes
- Next message: [CentOS] X session lockup (CentOS 4.7)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello All: I've configured a few instances of RedHat/CentOS clustering. For basic services such as web, dns, and LDAP it seems to work well. My basic configuration just uses the core services and a DRBD volume for the shared storage. We have some existing LifeKeeper clustered systems. I don't know much about them except that they use a similar hearbeat/shared storage solution. Has anyone here used both and can mention some pros/cons of each? In particular, is there anything that LifeKeeper provides that cannot be replicated via the RedHat/CentOS solution? Thanks all for any input.
- Previous message: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes
- Next message: [CentOS] X session lockup (CentOS 4.7)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list