[CentOS] Some basic LVM questions

Dave Stevens geek at uniserve.com
Sun Nov 8 23:39:17 UTC 2009


Quoting Monte Milanuk <memilanuk at gmail.com>:

> M. Hamzah Khan wrote:
>> On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 10:44 -0800, Monte Milanuk wrote:
>>
>> What I think most people do (and what I am doing now), is to setup
>> RAID-1 or so behind the volume group. This way you will still be safe if
>> one of the drives fail. Keep in mind that RAID is not a backup solution,
>> and you should still create regular backups. :)
>>
>
> In practical terms, it may all be a moot point.  I'm not too sure how
> much more I can jam in that mini-tower case without other problems, and
> (hopefully) 500GB should be enough storage for now; intended usage is
> just backing up users home directories from a few PCs & laptops in the
> house.  If I truly intend to implement LVM + RAID it may have to be in a
> newer dedicated setup.  I think for the time being though, I will look
> at removing the 500gb drive from the first volume group and creating a
> second one with just it in there.  Who knows, I might get brave and
> start mucking about w/ software raid and see what I can put together ;)
>
> I know everyone says RAID is not substitute for a proper backup
> solution... but this machine *is* the backup for the rest of the
> network.  At what point should one draw the line for backing up?  What
> is there out there that is still reasonably economical for backing up
> say, a RAID 1 setup of two 1TB drives, or a RAID 5 setup of three drives
> that size?  Tape?  Looks to be just about out-stripped in size by cheap
> hard drives, at least in anything even remotely in my price range.  NAS
> - which is probably going to have its own version of RAID?

well, I'm dealing with this right now, I've taken delivery of a pile  
of parts that will be a new server Real Soon Now (TM). The four 750  
drives will be a sw RAID 0+1 array with striping for performance and  
mirroring for redundancy. There will be an identical 5th drive in the  
box and not connected as a spare for 1 drive failure. Then there will  
be an off-site 1.5T in another box doing rsync as the last line of  
backup. The reason for sw raid is that I get to use eight opteron  
cores rather than the dinky cpu on a raid card and that I don't need  
to be concerned that a replacement raid controller might have a  
different BIOS than the one I started with.

HTH

Dave



> Thanks,
>
> Monte
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>



-- 
When addiction becomes commonplace in a society, people become  
addicted not only to alcohol and drugs, but to a thousand other  
destructive pursuits: money, power, dysfunctional relationships, or  
video games. A social perspective on addiction does not deny  
individual differences in vulnerability to addiction, but it removes  
them from the foreground of attention, because social determinants are  
more powerful.



More information about the CentOS mailing list