[CentOS] SAMBA vs NFS

Keith Keller kkeller at speakeasy.net
Thu Nov 26 17:40:09 UTC 2009


On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:14:56AM -0700, Craig White wrote:
> 
> NFS mounts for Linux users
> Samba for Windows users
> Netatalk for Macintosh clients

Wow, I didn't even know netatalk was still around!  How does it compare
to SMB on OS X clients?  I'm thinking that, unless you have a pressing
need for some particular netatalk option, that using Samba for those
clients as well simplifies admin on the backend.  IOW, what are the
scenarios where netatalk is either strongly preferred or required over
Samba?

--keith

-- 
kkeller at speakeasy.net

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091126/0a2818bd/attachment.bin 


More information about the CentOS mailing list