[CentOS] 10 Year old IT Infrastructure
mblackburn at glenraven.com
Mon Oct 12 13:04:35 UTC 2009
Assuming that you are going to lose this battle, If you have a virtual
environment, maybe you can do a P2V for backup purposes, so if it
fails, you have a backup.
If it makes you feel any better, we still have some Windows NT systems
still running on original hardware.
We are all terrified to touch it and we can't back it up, but they
refuse to upgrade it or get rid of it.
From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On
Behalf Of Stephen Nelson-Smith
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 2:19 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 10 Year old IT Infrastructure
On 10 Oct 2009, at 17:12, Brian Mathis wrote:
> The better solution would be to make sure you are prepared for when
> the hardware does fail. Inform the client that you understand that
> they don't want to upgrade the servers, and that hardware failure is
> not a case of "if" but "when". Lay out a plan to them describing what
> would happen when that occurs, and how you will make sure that their
> downtime is minimal.
Can't agree more. You want to present to the client that you care
first and foremost about their business needs. It's a simple
calculation - work out what's involved in maintaining the old systems,
and compare that to the cost of upgrading. These sorts of
conversations are often about the difference between operational
expenditure and capital expenditure - your client may be willing to
pay more long term support costs, and not be prepared to buy new
hardware and pay you to upgrade the systems.
It sounds to me that you want to upgrade because you're assuming it's
the right thing to do. That's a big assumption - go through the
business cases, and make sure your client understands you're on their
side which ever way the decision goes.
Atalanta Systems Ltd,
CentOS mailing list
CentOS at centos.org
More information about the CentOS